FIXED 8 mm BLOCKS / LARGER MODEL / ACTUAL COUNTS
Revisit the initial Fine C,
using 8 mm blocks.
Resemblance to the original character's face, proportions and roundness comes first. This Mona comparison explores an approximately 36 cm model without treating a low part count as success.
Compare further refinement beyond this 36 cm study →
This page retains the first 36 cm study's images and quantities. Further refinement is kept in a separate comparison record.
Checking publication status of the Mona comparison.
Awaiting actual images and counts.
Approximately 36 cm is a target, not the completed model's actual height or part count. No new-study counts or images are shown until the actual manifest, BOM and renders derived from the original are ready.
View the preserved initial Fine C reference →Actual part counts and size.
Part count means actual placed instances; type count means distinct shapes. The unsubdivided original is not assigned a block count.
| Comparison model | Actual parts | Types | 1×1 exceptions | Width × depth × height / mm | Placement layers | Separate minima: short side / long side / thickness / mm | Parts with a long side of at least 15.8 mm |
|---|
Minimum short side, long side and thickness may come from different parts. A long side of at least 15.8 mm is a geometric threshold, not a physical handling pass.
Part count and sampling detail are different.
The 8 mm block system stays fixed.
This part diagram uses 13 pixels per millimeter, a separate scale from the whole-model comparison at 2.5 pixels per millimeter.
Read the producer's observations and limitations
Evidence behind the images and counts.
Likeness and manufacturing approval are separate.
The new study is unselected. The larger model's weight, retention, tipping risk, printability and complete assembly remain unvalidated. It is NOT_SLICED and full-kit printing is on hold. This Mona comparison does not formally adopt the other two characters or a new kit.
Printing r2 in one go is a separate proposal. Its existing multipart arrangement is not guaranteed to be a one-piece printable model; that would require separate geometry preparation and slicing validation. This study creates no monolithic version, new trial pieces or print job.
View the earlier plate and slope studies as history → / Historical viewer for the low-part designs